Sun Jul 6 12:38:36 200817
YOU ARE HERE: > Homepage > ReutersLink News > “Blacks only” briefing splits South Africa media
“Blacks only” briefing splits South Africa media
2008-04-20 16:27:06

Jacob Zuma addresses a rally
Jacob Zuma addresses a rally
Reuters

A RACE ROW has broken out among South African journalists over a “blacks only” briefing given by ruling party leader Jacob Zuma  – and the country’s Human Rights Commission has sided with excluded white reporters.

It began when the Forum for Black Journalists (FBJ) hosted an off-the-record briefing in February by Zuma, the African National Congress President, who is expected to succeed Thabo Mbeke as the country’s president next year. Three white journalists tried to get into the meeting at the five-star Intercontinental Sandton Sun hotel in Johannesburg but were turned away on the basis of their skin colour.

Other media organisations and civil rights groups voiced concern, and a complaint was lodged with the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) by Katy Katopodis, news editor of Talk Radio 702 and 94.7 Highveld Stereo, two of whose reporters had been barred (the other was from e.tv.  “Surely South Africa is beyond such blatant displays of racism,” she asked the commission.

In finding against the black journalists’ group, the Human Rights Commission declared that “the policy by the FBJ of restricting its membership on the basis of race would not pass constitutional muster.” It urged the FBJ to amend its rules so as not to exclude anyone on the basis of race.

“Judicial ambush”

The FBJ, first launched 11 years ago, was incensed. Its chairman, Abbey Makoe, political editor of the national broadcaster SABC, called it a “judicial ambush” and said the commission had a dubious understanding of racism in  this case.  Historically, black journalists had been disadvantaged and sidelined - now they needed a forum to discuss their issues separately.

“SAHRC has found us guilty of being black,” Makoe said. “No banning order will stop us.” Zuma himself, who has accused the media of biased reporting of the ongoing corruption case against him,  told reporters at the briefing that he saw nothing wrong with their exclusionary policy, but it was up to them.

Jody Kollapen, head of the SAHRC, said it recognised the FBJ’s right to exist, and was backed in this by  Radio 702’s Katopodis. “We have absolutely no qualm” with the formation of the FBJ, Katopodis said, but it had to transform and move forward. “We’d like to all work together for the advancement of journalism, irrespective of race.”

A commentary in The Sowetan newspaper by freelance writer Oupa Ngwenya, secretary-general of the Forum for Black Journalists, said the FBJ had been “cunningly outfoxed by the racist tag that has become a standard accusation to all black initiatives.” It went on:

“With the black community sinking deeper into hopelessness, the rising tide of political correctness has evidently usurped the centre stage to push all else that is black to a questionable periphery that is out of sync with the new South Africa.”

Ngwenya added that “articulation of black aspirations” was being “forever stalked and vetoed by unfounded white fears.”

Professors have their say

Academics have also weighed into the debate.  At the University of Johannesburg, Professor Adam Habib said he was bothered by racially structured organisations like the FBJ; they posed the question “whether, 14 years into democracy such structures are really necessary.”

Guy Berger, another media analyst, who heads the journalism department at Rhodes University, wrote in the Mail & Guardian: “The Forum of Black Journalists is welcome to choose whoever it likes to attend its meetings. Black, white or blue. It’s a free country. But no journalists, of whatever hue, should be in the business of organising off-the-record briefings with political leaders...

“Why would any journalist act to encourage secret information flows as a first-choice engagement with a source? Especially in regard to a public politician who may be the next South African president.”

Well-known media analyst Anton Harber, Professor of Journalism at the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg,  wrote in a column in Business Day newspaper that the most notable thing was the very fact that by its actions the FBJ had prompted such an outcry. “There is something in the air that allows people, black and white, to say for the first time: this is ridiculous. These people do not speak for us.”

Harber  asked: “What kind of person is it that will stand at the door of a public event and say to their colleagues and associates: ‘Turn around and go away because you are white’? That is not a person... who can feel good about thir contribution to the new S.A.

“What kind of journalist will take umbrage and say their colleagues are disrespectful when they come to a meeting they have not been invited to? This is not a person who understands the first thing about journalism. That is what we do: we knock on doors which are closed, we try to find out what is going on behind them. What kind of reporters would we be if we were interested only in meetings to which we had a formal invitation?...

“If Zuma was really smart, he would have waived the off-the-record provision and invited all journalists in. He would have won respect and looked like a true national leader, rather than a tawdry politician trying to cosy up to journalists and avoiding difficult moral issues.”

Ido Lekota, political editor of The Sowetan, retorted: “It was made clear that white journalists were not invited. Is there anything wrong for victims of apartheid, 14 years down the line, to caucus?”

Sacked for racism

In a separate development, outspoken commentator David Bullard was sacked by his editor at the Sunday Times for writing a “racist column”  detailing how South Africa has supposedly benefited from colonialism.

Editor Mondli Makhanya the piece had overstepped the mark and “went against the values of this newspaper.”

Makhanya added: “It was clear he believes blacks to be indolent savages.”  The Sunday Times respected its readers and although its mission was to provoke, challenge and entertain, it would not insult or abuse them.                      

Bullard himself published a “sincere and heartfelt” apology in Business Day - but later said he would sue the Sunday Times over the summary manner of his dismissal.

PJM April 2008






 

0 responses to "“Blacks only” briefing splits South Africa media"

Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on the left

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.